Buy an essay on Hancock

How does Hancock attempt to inflame the passions of his audience and unite them to his cause?
Hancock appeals to patriotic feelings of Americans to inflame the passions of his audience and to unite them to his cause. At the same time, his appeal to the patriotism of Americans is grounded on specific references to cases of the oppression from the part of the British. To put it more precisely, Hancock refers to unjust policies conducted by the British in relation to Americans, who cannot afford living under the British anymore.
In such a way, Hancock uncovers cases of the unjust policies and violation of basic rights of Americans by the British to inflame his countrymen to rebel against the tyranny of Great Britain. The sense of injustice naturally inflames the audience and people feel furious that their rights and liberties are violated unjustly. Basically, the use of such technique helps Hancock to unite the audience in the struggle against the common enemy, Great Britain.
In fact, Hancock uses the external threat and the fear of the audience in regard to the future is the major tools that inflame the audience. At the same time, Hancock does not simply inflame the audience but he appeals to actions. He wants people to start acting right now to stop injustice. At this point, it is worth mentioning the fact that injustice evokes strong emotions in the audience because people feel they are oppressed by those who commit unjust acts. Hence, people feel their inferiority caused by the injustice because the injustice means little opportunities to have equal rights and liberties for all people.

buy an essay

Moreover, the injustice is closely associated with the violation of basic human rights and people are not willing to give in their rights and liberties because of the existing injustice. Instead, they are ready to fight till the last drop of their blood if they feel that someone or a group of people oppresses them and do unjust acts that make their life worse. As a result, when Americans heard of the injustice of the British, they grew inflamed with the rage, whereas patriotism united them in their common struggle against the British whom they hated because of their injustice in relation to colonists.
To back up his message, Hancock uses threat and fear to evoke even stronger emotions in the audience and to make the audience start acting and rebelling against the British. First, Hancock makes the audience feel fear because he depicts horrors of the British rule and possible effects of their rule. The fear is a natural feeling which forces people to start acting because they want to escape fear by all possible means. Therefore, the use of fear by Hancock motivates his audience to start acting. In such a way, Hancock manipulates with his audience and uses fear to make Americans willing to act, to change their life, even if they need to start a revolution against the British, whom they hate and who act unjustly in relation to them.
In such a context, threats used by Hancock in his speech keep the audience stuck to the key message of Hancock that the British are dangerous for the future of Americans and they have to be expelled from America. He threatens to Americans to show them that inaction is more dangerous than action. This means that, according to Hancock, Americans would better start a rebellion than keep waiting till the British oppress them and deprive of their rights, liberties, and property.
4. What types of evidence does Hancock provide to support his claim that Britain’s acts are “tyrannical”?
Hancock uses factual evidences to show the tyranny of the British in colonies. In such a way, he appeals to the reason of his audience to persuade people that they need to rise against the power of the British. The rebellion turns out to be the only logical way out of the problems Americans faced in colonies.
Hancock shows that the tyranny from the part of Britain is systematic and occurs on the regular basis. He shows that acts of oppression of rights of Americans are tyrant by their nature. Hence, he concludes that American people should put the tyranny of Britain.
Finally, he uses the historical experience as the evidence of the necessity to overthrow Great Britain’s power in America. He uses examples from the past to show that injustice and tyranny should be stopped.