Buy essay on Articles Review “Sheltered Instruction: Best Practices for ELLs in the Mainstream” by Holly Hansen-Thomas.

The first article is “Sheltered Instruction: Best Practices for ELLs in the Mainstream” by Holly Hansen-Thomas.
1) The problem statement of this article is the following: ELLs (English language learners) should use sheltered instructions to achieve the same success in the learning as the native English speakers.
2) The hypothesis stated by the author is the following: “Sheltered instruction is designed to provide second language learners with the same high-quality, academically challenging content that native English speakers receive.(Hansen-Thomas, 2008)”
3) There is no literature review in the article, thought the author cites for a few times the research of Echevarria, J., M. Vogt, and D. J. Short “Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model” and the book of Chamot, A. U., and J. M. O’Malley “The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach.” Generally literature review doesn’t provide the balanced picture of the research problem, giving just general description of research base.
4) The author doesn’t provide the section of methods due to the descriptive nature of the article. Instead she describes the areas of the sheltered instructions implementation.
5) The study did not involve the participants but the author provides some theoretical examples.
6) The study is theoretical not experimental.
7) There weren’t instruments distributed and collected.
8) The timeline of the study wasn’t defined.
9) The only method of information analysis used and described in the article was the method of replacement. “To illustrate how sheltered instruction benefits second language learners, preservice and in-service teachers should put themselves in the shoes of the ELLs in their classrooms and identify the instructional techniques that would facilitate their comprehension of content presented in not only another language, but also from a different cultural perspective. .(Hansen-Thomas, 2008)” The result proved that many participants was lacking of necessary cultural and informational context to understand the usual instructions.
10) The major finding of the study is the necessity of the sheltered instructions for EELs, which corresponds to the hypothesis that the instructions can influence on the students’ academic success.
11) The closing thought of the author concludes the research in sufficient manner. There are no obvious limitations.
12) The future research of the effectiveness of sheltered instructions as the “specific instructional practices tailored to the second language learner.(Hansen-Thomas, 2008)” can be needed.
13) This article is tied with the first of my problem statement, “new methods to reduce classroom anxiety for mainstreamed ESL students.” The findings and results can be useful for this problem solving.