Custom essays on THE FORGOTTEN GROUP MEMBER

Basically, there are four stages of group development, including forming, storming, norming, and performing, although not all groups reach the last stage in the group development. The forming stage includes the first meeting and creation of the group (Hughes, Ginnett, & Curphy, 2006). At this stage, group members make acquainted with each other and establish their first communication and relationships. Christine’s group has reached this stage of group development successfully as well as the storming stage. The storming stage is the stage, when the group generates idea on how the group should operate and what each group member should do (Hughes, Ginnett, & Curphy, 2006). At this stage, the group consolidates. After that, the next stage comes up, the norming stage, when the group reaches agreement on how the group operates (Hughes, Ginnett, & Curphy, 2006). In addition, the group sets goals it is supposed to achieve and redistributes functions within the group. In fact, Christine’s group has reached this stage but failed to pass to the next stage, the performing stage (Hughes, Ginnett, & Curphy, 2006). The performing stage implies the work of the group on the achievement of set goals and effective cooperation group members.
PART 2. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
In fact, the effective team work and close cooperation within the team are the most difficult and problematic issues in Christine’s team. In fact, Mike has dropped out of the group and failed to perform his duties properly that has put under a threat positive outcomes of the group work.
In addition, the group apparently suffered from the poor communication within the group. In fact, Mike has turned out to be an outsider of the group. Team members failed to communicate with Mike. At any rate, all their efforts to involve Mike in the group communication have failed and Mike always remained outside the group.
PART 3. RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION
The group members should unite their efforts to involve Mike in the team work. Obviously, Christine should not and could not solve this problem on her own. Instead, the assistance of other group members was essential. Team members could encourage Mike to participate in the team work to reach positive outcomes. The impact of team members on Mike could be significant because he could feel the responsibility he has in light of the task the group has been working hard on. Instead, as he communicated with Christine as the group leader mainly, probably, he viewed his duties as a sort of personal obligation to help Christine, ignoring other team members.
Moreover, Christine should motivate Mike to work better and to participate in the team work. Probably, she should learn more about his interests and personal problems and, if possible, assist him in their resolution to make him enthusiastic and eager to help the team to complete its task.
PART 4. REFLECTION
Christine was ineffective leader because she could not unite her group and lead it to the successful accomplishment of the task. In fact, she managed well four team members but Mike has dropped out irrevocably. She has failed to pass from the norming to performing stage in the group development because she has managed to define goals of the team and functions of each group member, but she has failed to establish close interpersonal relationships within the group, create healthy atmosphere and motivate all team members to work hard on the task.

REFERENCES
Hughes, R., R. Ginnett, & G. Curphy. (2006). Leadership, Enhancing The Lessons of Experience. New York: Random House.