Buy essay on Avram Noam Chomsky

Avram Noam Chomsky is a well known American linguist, political publicist and theorist. He is linguistics professor of The Massachusetts Institute, the author of Classification of formal languages, known as Chomsky Hierarchy. His works, especially Language Acquisition Device development provided a great impact on the behaviorism decay and assisted development of the cognitive sciences. Probably the most known work by Chomsky is Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, which produced a great impact on the linguistics related sciences development all over the world; a number of investigators consider that that his investigations could be related to as a revolution and made a significant breakthrough within the linguistics (a shift within the scientific paradigm in Kuhn’s terminology). Perception of one or the other ideas created by Chomsky’s theory of generativism (generative grammar of Chomsky) is felt even in that trends of linguistics, which does not accept is main statements and strongly criticize the theory suggested by Chomsky.
During the years this theory evolved significantly (that is why many scientists relate to his theories but not a single one), but its fundamental statement, which gave birth to all the other exiting and relating statement was left unchangeable – the innateness character of ability to speak a language. According to Chomsky himself this fundamental statement gave birth to a number of other linguistic theories and approaches. Chomsky invented his theory yet in 1955, in one of his early works, which was dealing with the transformational grammar. The theory examines different word statements (in some kind this could be related to as a word order), which corresponded to the abstract “surface structures”, which correspond to the structures which are even more abstract “D – structures”. In contemporary versions of the theory the difference between the surface and D – structures erased in many components. Transformational rules alongside with the structural rules and principles describe as creation as well as interpretation of the word statements. With the help of the final outfit of grammar rules and meanings people could create unlimited number of sentences, even create the sentences, which have never been created before.

buy essay

The ability to perform such structural approach to the word statements is our innateness process, the author relate to as a part of the genetic program of every human being. He considers that we could hardly comprehend these structural principles, as well as we do not understand a number of other biological and cognitive peculiarities of our organism. The initial ability to speak a language is strongly criticized by the supporters of the behaviorist theory such as Eric Lennenberg, who support the idea, that primary language skills (such as building the sentences with the help of the word statements and set phrases) are developed during the process of human growing up: “The ongoing process of lateralization is subdivided into five levels: an infant up to 20 months has identical hemispheres without functional differences; a toddler up to 36 months develops a preference for either the right or the left hand, but the responsibility for language still can easily switch an other hemisphere; a child up to 10 years is still able to reactivate language functions in the right hemisphere; in the early puberty – up to 14 years – the equipotentiality rapidly declines, and after that it is lost completely. Lenneberg talks about a “reactivation”, not “creation” of the language function in the right hemisphere” (Lennenberg, 1967)
The recent versions of Chomsky’s theory (such as Minimalistic program) have a number of strong evident statements dealing with the so called universal grammar. According to Chomsky’s vision grammatical principles lying in the basis of the language systems, are innateness and unchangeable, and the differences between the languages of the world could be explained by the terms of parametrical arrangement of the brain, which could be compared in this case with some kind of switches. Using these theoretical approaches it goes without saying that a child to learn a language need to get familiar to the lexical units (the words themselves) and morphemes and also signify the necessary specific instances of the brain settings, which could be done with the help of the key examples
Such an approach according to Chomsky explains, that outstanding velocity that is typical for children studying the new languages, the related stages of studying the language by the child (without taking into consideration what the language is) and also the typical mistakes made by the children, studying the native language, the same time the mistakes that seem to be logic did not happen. According to the Chomsky opinion existence or absence of such mistakes signifies the used approach: general (innateness) or depending from the concrete language.
The ideas suggested by Chomsky provided a significant impact on the scientists investigating the process of learning the language by the children, but as it often happens some of them do not agree to the ideas and approaches suggested by Chomsky, following the immersionist and connectivist theories which are based on the tries to explain the general processes of information elaboration by the brain. It should be noted that almost all the theories, explaining the processes of language adoption are now considered to be disputable and examination of Chomsky and other scientists’ theories is going on.

 
References:
1. Lennenberg E., 1967. Biological Foundations of Language. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
2. Chomsky N. ,1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press.
3. Language and Learning. The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky, Harvard University Press, 1980