Buy essay on Further development of civil disobedience in the USA. It’s meaning in the 21th century

In recent years the methods of civil disobedience have been widely used by organizers of the “color revolutions”, and in some cases led to the overthrow of governments in them. At the same time theorists are trying to protect the idea of civil disobedience from the reproaches of her dangers and use in manipulating society, arguing that non-violent violation of the laws, carried out in the name of democratic values, serves to strengthen the society. Civil disobedience, they claim, is a measure of maturity of the society in which the continual challenges of social values and ideas of public good is a litmus test, while the catalyst pluralism.
In the United States, beginning from the 1970 movement for the abolition of abortions were carried out extensively, blocking access to medical facilities where abortions were performed. In some cases, opponents of abortion have chosen the scene of his massive stake in a small town, creating serious problems for municipalities and attracting the attention of the press. In response to growing violence associated with these shares in 1994, in the U.S. have passed laws guaranteeing free access to clinics.
Finally, and this is important to pay particular attention to civil disobedience is justified, if it does not lead to serious social unrest and undermine the effectiveness of a fair constitution and respect for the rule of law.
In 1990 the initiative group of “Americans with disabilities for accessible public transport” held demonstrations, whose members in wheelchairs climbed the stairs of the Capitol. On 26 July 1990 Congress passed a law guaranteed for the disabled easy access to public transport and buildings.
Civil disobedience is often manifested in a refusal to pay taxes or to recognize the state laws and regulations in recent years increasingly practiced by various movements that believe that the U.S. government was exceeding its mandate by taking a very strict control of everyday life. Although many of these groups profess the principles of nonviolence, and announce their spiritual fathers of such thinkers as Henry Thoreau, among them there are supporters of armed resistance, which create closed enclaves, isolated from society and live by its own internal laws. April 19, 1995 bombing an office building in Oklahoma City, anti-government extremists sparked a movement for tougher anti-terrorism laws.
To the extent that civil disobedience is appealing to the public sense of justice, when directed against cases of serious and obvious to all violations of basic principles, such as depriving the minority of any civil or economic rights. On the contrary, acts of civil disobedience would be ineffective if they are directed against such government decisions or new laws restricting the scope of which in relation to basic rights is not obvious to the public.
Furthermore, civil disobedience is justified in situations where other means of political struggle are ineffective. To the extent that civil disobedience is considered as a last resort, need to be exactly sure that it is absolutely necessary. However, even when civil disobedience to meet the formal conditions of success, it will not be truly successful if the ruling majority is definitely chose the tactics of the unjust and hostile attitude towards the minority.
Finally, and this is important to pay particular attention to, that civil disobedience is justified if it does not lead to serious social unrest and undermine the effectiveness of a fair constitution and respect for the rule of law.

References:

1. Michael J Larman. “Board of Education and the civil rights movement”. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2007, p.55
2. Risa L. Goluboff. “The Lost Promise of Civil Rights”. Harvard University Press, MA:Cambridge,2007, p.249-251
3. D. R. Weber. “Civil Disobedience in America: A Documentary History”. 1978
4. Townsend Davis. “Weary Feet, Rested Souls: A Guided History of the Civil Rights Movement”. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1998. pp. 311
5. American Civil Liberties Union. Humans Rights Violations in the United States. “Human Rights Watch”. United States Library of Congress, 1993.
6. Rhoda Blumberg. “Civil Rights : The 1960’s Freedom Struggle”. Boston, 1984
7. Walter Capps “The Unfinished War : Vietnam and the American Conscience”. Boston, 1982
8. Allen Matusow. “The Unraveling of America : A History of Liberalism in the 1960’s”. NY, 1984
9. Nicholas Klar. “How did the 1960’s protest movements force American society from a position of consensus, to accommodation, and finally to division?”. Web. Retrieved 2010-04-30