Buy essay on The conflict work place situation

Speaking about the conflict work place situation there should be made a stress on the fact the origin of the conflict is within inappropriate empowerment. And the conflict on the workplace was created artificially as before the empowerment of a certain group of people the whole staff was communicating and providing efficient work performing. The changes provided created unhealthful oppressive atmosphere and lessened work performing. It goes without saying that the empowerment, which has become very popular in contemporary managerial practice, did not reach its results.
Analyzing the conflict situation I think that the core role is belonging to the personality. The working process involves a group of people which represent three groups: the chief, group A (empowered workers, who are more responsible for the working process), other workers (who feel themselves mistreated as they are not empowered and feel oppressed by the group A). It goes without saying that the healthy atmosphere between the staff members could hardly be observed. The conflict of professional interests, when oppression of group of individuals is observed by another group of co-workers and the chief as the leader is aware about the things happening. Describing the situation the member of oppressed group strongly believes that chief supposed to use the contemporary empowerment technique, which is regarded by raising motivation within the staff but the result is not satisfactory. One group of people is just keep a controlling eye another is working for themselves and those who control, as being empowered group A refused to participate in the working process and every personality of Group A is using their empowerment privilege to oppress the other members of the team.
The chief, when empowering a group of individuals did not take into account the position and perception of the rest people, who do not find it equal and negatively respond to the empowerment of the group of co-workers. The empowered group of people misunderstand that empowerment does not mean that they should not participate in the working process, but just getting bonuses for the good performance. It seems that in current situation personalities empowered provoke the burning of the conflict as they do not treat their co-workers as it was before empowerment and shifted their work on the other members of the team. It goes without saying that the conflict situation lies far deeper than inappropriate usage of empowerment and that makes the problem more complicated. Seek for solution understand the usage of psychological theories that would help to find the origin and solution of the problem
According to the contemporary psychological theories (Malsow, Erikson and Adler) the core principle of successful communication between the personalities is motivation and the significance of the described situation is that the chief motivating Group A provided oppressive effect on the rest of the team members. Motivation is the core question in the description of this case. Many years ago psychologists from different countries came to the conclusion that appropriate way of motivation raises the productivity on the working place. According to the theories of interpersonal relation by Erikson (1993) and Sullivan (1968) social and interpersonal relations are fundamental and according to Adler (1989), the power is the core principle for investigating the subject. Personally I support Adler’s theory of motivation and contemporary methods of empowerment perfectly illustrate the situation I am analyzing. Inappropriate shift of powers negatively reflected on the motivation of both groups.

buy essay

Previously we see that the staff was rather friendly sharing the same tasks, but when one of the personality’s groups became empowered the situation radically changed. The a8uthor appeals to the fact that chief is unaware about the situation happened, that is why he is doing nothing to change it and provide appropriate atmosphere on the work place. According to the psychological theories the only way to solve the situation is to make the chief aware officially, providing official complaint letter from the rest of the staff, where describe the peculiarities of the conflict. The described workplace situation is in such conditions when the oppressed members of the staff do nothing and wait for the problem solution. But this won’t work. The problem of interpersonal relations could not be solved itself and the step to the solution should be made from individual’s side. As the two participating sides of the conflict are satisfied with the current statement of things it goes without saying that personalities from the oppressed side should take initiative into their hands and start the process of regulation and seek for the equality. The first step as it was mentioned earlier is the writing of official complaint letter, signed by all the personalities oppressed by dominating Group A and after the chief get aware about current situation seek for the equality. It goes without saying that it won’t be an easy task, hence contemporary social movements are the good example for further struggle for equality and this group is not the first in their intensions. The personality describing the situation strongly believes that chief is unaware and we should undertake this position. When the chief would be accustomed to the current state of things the problem solution should undergo. Here everything depends on the chief style of leadership. But I suppose that using of empowerment techniques, which is the newest theory for raising motivation, characterizes him as the one who is well aware about innovative practice. I think that further development would depend on the position the oppressed side take. I think that the will of the equality is normal for contemporary people. That is why the individuals oppressed by the group A should explain their position and let the chief understand that it is impossible to perform efficiently in such facilities. They do not seek for extraordinary changes (or punishment for the oppression) but for the equality as they do not want to make the other’s job. It is essential. I think that according to the contemporary psychological and managerial approaches for solution of such questions this particular situation has very good perspectives for further solution. I think that the chief, getting aware about the situation would easily solve it and provide equal working facilities for the both sides.
In the end I would like to return to the beginning making a stress on the fact that empowerment does not mean shifting your work performance on the other personalities and equality is a core principle for contemporary effective performing and successful interpersonal relation. The situation described has good perspectives for peaceful solution and it could be illustrated by a number examples.

References:
Adler, A. (1989). Individual psychology of Alfred Adler: A systematic presentation in selections from his writings. New York: HarperCollins
Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper.
Erikson, E. (1993). Childhood and society. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Sullivan, H. S. (1968). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.