Buy essay on U.S. Democracy Promotion Policy in the Middle East

Since September 11, 2001 the U.S. Government has started a new public diplomacy, aimed at democracy promotion as an instrument for combatting terrorism. The Bush Administration has made the promotion of democracy in the Middle East a national security priority. (Epstein et al. 2007)
The important aspect of the topic is U.S. Democracy Promotion Policy in the Middle East. The purposes of this aid is the service of American interests, the support of allies, and the establishment of peace – are sound, reasonable, and just. The idea of using America’s vast economic power to mold the international arena has always been an important element of American foreign policy.
President George W. Bush’s stated the reason for starting the war in Iraq was to bring democracy to that country. He stated in December 2006 that: “We are committed to a strategic goal of a free Iraq that is democratic, that can govern itself, defend itself and sustain itself.” (Epstein et al. 2007)
The United States employs a variety of diplomatic tools and policy instruments to promote democracy in the Middle East, and one of the most effective is bilateral diplomacy with Arab governments on the reform issue. (Albright, 2005)
The U.S. policy towards Middle East countries is based, according to the American strategy to help countries in the region, “to ensure the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity” .These global objectives of the United States intended to achieve by:
1. Create democratic political institutions.
2. Provide market economic reforms with a view to accelerating economic development.
3. Develop cooperation among regional states and integration into the global community.
4. To hold effective security policy, including the fight against terrorism and drug trafficking. (Epstein et al. 2007)
It should be noted that the tasks are solved in general, and democratic institutions are created, but the fact is that not complied with the principles that form the basis of these institutions.
Middle East Policy of the new Abama’s Administration

President Obama has won support not only in the United States but also in the Arab world, as the Arab world has great expectations and hopes that Obama will rebuild trust relations between the United States and Middle East countries.
One of the main regional concern is the situation in Iraq, because any serious step toward ending occupation there will have a tremendously positive effect on world opinion toward the USA. It is a well known fact that Arabs saw the invasion of Iraq as a war on the whole region, so they will welcome any initiative that restores sovereignty and control over their resources to the Iraqi people as a step toward rectifying Arab–U.S. relations. (Ottaway et. al, 2008)
The American policy is interpreted as aiming to strengthen its power and control in the region: for example the fight with autocratic regime of Saddam Hussein was not viewed as democratic regime change but as an imperialist war intended to control Iraq’s oil and destroy the Arab military power. It is possible to say that any policy by the United States will be seen as a war with Arabian world, even if it is based on a moral pretext ( such as the removal of a dictator Saddam Hussein). (Epstein et al. 2007)
The failure of the Bush administration policy was due to ambiguity in its policies, from conflicting priorities in the Middle East: supporting Israel’s security while pressing for the democratization of the region, ensuring the flow of oil, protecting allied regimes while fighting terrorism, and pursuing public diplomacy. Because of these conflicting policy goals, the United States found itself without true allies and with limited and ineffective achievements. So the success of U.S. policies in the Middle East under the Obama administration depends on avoiding these policy flaws.
Today the United States see its task in the development of new geo-strategy for the Middle East region. In the short term (5-10 years) the U.S. intend to rebuild the existing now geopolitical pluralism in the Eurasian region. In these circumstances, political maneuvering and diplomatic strategy of the United States is aimed to exclude the possibility of formation of hostile coalitions, independent units able to challenge the national security and American leadership.
The administration of U.S. President Barack Obama has recently completed the revision of its policy priorities in Middle East. Senators noted the importance of the Middle East coutries to implement a new strategy for Obama in the region, as well as the need to further strengthen ties with all states in the region. “The task of the United States in the Middle East is to help countries to strengthen stability, as well as solve the problems of terrorism and the efficient allocation of energy resources,” – said in his speech, Senator Robert Casey.