- 04/02/2013
- Posted by: essay
- Category: Free essays
Shakespeare was deeply and in various ways connected with the British reality, the power of his realism was above national framework that allowed him to realize and resolve in images the most important questions of historical development of Europe at that time. In his critique of contemporary social problems Shakespeare exposes the obscurantism and vices of feudalism, but the center part had taken the criticism of the emerging capitalism, to show the incompatibility of humanistic ideals of the new bourgeois world of money and interests. One of the major evils that distort human relationships Shakespeare considered self-interest, greed and power of gold. In contrast to the feudal and bourgeois oppression Shakespeare sees the ideal of life based on freedom, justice and domestic equality of all people together. This ideal, because of its utopian, is vague and contradictory, but Shakespeare insisted on it through a complex system of its artistic images.
In “The tempest” social and moral issues become significant: the problem of social inequality, law and morality, with elements of satire and grotesque, the action is close to the tragedy and happy ending is formal.
In “The Tempest” Shakespeare reflected one of the biggest historical events of his era: the policy of colonial expansion. This topic was very important for the development of the society of the time, so important were and all the associated social and moral issues.
buy research
References:
1. Christine Dymkowski. “The Tempest”. Cambridge: Cambridge University, Press, 2000.
2. Herbert Coursen. “The Tempest: A Guide to the Play”. Westport: Greenwood Press, 2000
3. Rex Gibson. “The Tempest”. Cambridge Student Guides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
4. Ernest B. Gilman. “All eyes”: Prospero’s Inverted Masque”. Renaissance Quarterly. July 1980. Pp. 214–230.
5. Stanley Wells, Lena Cowen Orlin. “Shakespeare: An Oxford Guide”. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003
6. Stanley Wells. “Shakespeare & Co”. New York: Pantheon, 2006
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.