Buy term paper on Application of Ethics of International Affairs

Israel’s Policy of strategic ambiguity
It is known that Israel has always practiced a rather advantageous policy of strategic ambiguity. This is a state which has an undeclared nuclear power. According to the relevant data, there is a nuclear plant in the city of Dimona, which is located in the Negev desert. It was built for civilian use in 1960. It is said that there is a huge nuclear arsenal, but the government of Israel has always followed the policy of strategic ambiguity. I think that Israel wants to protect the country by means of nuclear weapons. If Israel signs the global Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the country will be put at risk. It is known that several years ago the Prime Minister of Israel, Ehud Olmert, acknowledged the nuclear capability of the state. The issue was connected with Iran’s threats “to wipe Israel off the map”. He mentioned Israel in the list of those countries which officially have nuclear weapons including the USA, Russia, and France. (McCarthy 2010)
The present Prime Minister of Israel states that “nuclear-armed Iran is the greatest security threat” for Israel. I think that it is necessary to take measures and to solve this important issue by joint forces.
I think that the policy of strategic ambiguity is rather risky because it may lead to misinterpretations of the country’s intentions. Moreover, this policy can lead to those actions which contradict the country’s intentions. Thus, it is not clear if Israel possesses the nuclear weapons, or it is wrong. However, it is clear that Israel does not want to open its facilities to the International Atomic Energy Agency in order to carry out the international inspections and to destroy the arsenal of the state.
Secretary’s Chu’s remarks about Iran
It is known that the US Energy Secretary Steven Chu delivered his speech at the IAEA conference where he touched upon the issue connected with Iran’s violation of non-proliferation obligations. Moreover, he claimed that Iran refused “to satisfy legitimate concerns about the nature of its nuclear program”. It is said that Iran refuses to inform the International Atomic Energy Agency of the state’s nuclear facilities. (Energy Secretary Chu on Iran’s Nuclear Activities)buy term paper
I think that it is really a great problem for the International Atomic Energy Agency, because Iran’s nuclear arsenal can lead to serious damages in case of war actions with Israel or other countries. It is also difficult to speak about the Iran’s peaceful intentions, as well as about its readiness to build confidence.
I completely agree with the words of the Energy Secretary, Steven Chu, who said that the international community “must safeguard against any possible diversion or misuse of nuclear energy, whether by nations or terrorists, and ensure that nations that violate their obligations face consequences”. (Energy Secretary Chu on Iran’s Nuclear Activities)
It is also known that the United Nations Security Council has imposed several economic sanctions on Iran on the ground of Iran’s nuclear activities. I think that this is a right solution.
Moreover, the Energy Secretary, Steven Chu announced that the government of Iran has two options to choose. They can comply with their legal obligations. It can help to restore the international confidence in their peaceful intentions of the nuclear activities. The second option is connected with isolation and severe international censure. This option can cause serious economic losses to the country because most of the states will ignore Iran in the world market. I am sure that it is better for the government of Iran to choose the first option. They should realize that there is no confidence in the country which tries to solve its problems by means of nuclear activities.
APPLICATION OF SIX PRINCIPLES IDENTIFIED IN COICAUD AND WARNER TO THE NUCLEAR PROBLEM OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
According to Coicaud and Warner, there are six principles which can be easily applied to the nuclear problem of international relations. They include the following ones:
• sovereign equality of states;
• self-determination of peoples;
• prohibition on the threat and the use of force;
• peaceful settlement of disputes;
• non-intervention in the internal affairs of other states;
• respect for human rights.
In our case, when we speak about nuclear weapons, it is obvious that such principles as prohibition on the threat and the use of force, peaceful settlement of disputes, respect for human rights can be applied to the nuclear problem. However, such principle as non-intervention in the internal affairs of other states cannot be applied to the above mentioned nuclear problems, because the use of nuclear weapons in military purposes can lead to serious consequences not only in the neighbor countries, but also in the whole world. The same can be said about the principle of self-determination of peoples. For example, Israel and Iran violate the rules of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Israel does not want to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. It means that this state has some illegal plans connected with the use of nuclear weapons. Here, the principle of self-determination is wrong because in case of nuclear war millions of peaceful people throughout the world will be killed. The same can be said about Iran that refuses to inform the International Atomic Energy Agency of its nuclear facilities and violates the established rules.
Moreover, both Israel and Iran do not respect human rights. These states do not think about the lives of other people who are against war action, who want to live in peace. Of course, the illegal actions of these states should be criticized. It is necessary to convince them to change their decision concerning the use of nuclear weapons. These states should use the forth principle of international relations (peaceful settlements of disputes).
One more important thing is that the principle of sovereign equality of states should be taken into consideration in any case, because true international relations are based on non-discrimination and trust. All the nations are equal. It is very important to remember this fact in order to avoid serious consequences, which can include war actions and breakdown of trust.
CONCLUSION
It is clear that nuclear problem is one of the most important problems, because it is connected with the life on this planet. Nuclear weapons are considered to be the weapons of terror. Nuclear weapons are illegal and immoral. The possession of nuclear weapons can lead to dangerous situation. Nuclear weapons can be used by accident or by terrorists. In this case, there will be a lot of victims. Miscalculation also can be a serious threat for peaceful people. These weapons can lead to wars and loss of trust among nations. Nuclear weapons can destroy our cities, kill our people, and pollute water, air, and food. That is why it is necessary to find right solution and to destroy nuclear weapons as soon as possible.