Custom essays on Applying the New Poor Law on the Contemporary Realities

It the present day world the situation with poverty in the well developed countries is much better than in the first half of the 19th century in Britain and it should be noted that such a law in the present day world would cause significant resonance and disaffection of the working class. Especially impossible in contemporary society I see segregation as it violates the individual’s rights for choice and privacy. The “iron law” would also cause a number of arguments and they were mainly negative. I think that such law is impossible in the present day world cause of the changed situation with the poverty, development of the workplace and development of human rights. This law, viewed from the contemporary norms, violates the rights of the humanity and could be hardly applied. The contemporary situation with poverty supposes that it is the choice of those who want to be poor themselves. Numerous social programs, made better advantage in Britain, Europe and the US for decreasing the poverty, than ‘iron laws for wages’ and segregation of the married couples. It goes without saying that such types of law were acceptable by the worse organized society and impossible for the current realities as it would not be left without attention of international organizations as well. The contemporary programs aimed on decreasing poverty really help those who eager to live better life or provide the better life for their children, one of the core aspects is liquidation of illiteracy. In this New Poor Law there was no even a slight hint on the supposed connection of the law to the liquidation illiteracy within the working class, which supposed better life for them and their career growth, their growth of wages. They suppose by cutting the wages and separating the families they would solve the poverty problem.

The contemporary investigation show that they failed to provide that and it is not surprising. The contemporary struggle against poverty, with their loyal programs and educational orientation sometimes do not reach the desired effect as people do not want to leave the poverty level and everything is good for them and social programs can do nothing with it as people, whom the work is suggested do not attend it. They are happy being poor. Hence I think that the question is very important and should be under the governmental control all the time.
In the end I would like to make a stress on the fact that the New Poor Law was an attempt either. Even it did not reach all the set aims, it provided the result which has become a good lesson for further generation willing to struggle the poverty.
1. Poynter J. (1960). Society and pauperism. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
2. Gash N. (1967). The Age of Peel. Edward Arnold.
3. Poynter, J. (1998). Malthus and his critics. Malthus Bicentenary Conference
4. Fraser D. (1973). The evolution of the welfare state. Macmillan
5. Laybourn K. (1995).The evolution of British social policy and the welfare state. Keele University Press.
6. Spicker, P. (2002) British social policy 1601-1948. Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen.
7. Bruce M. (1978). The coming of the welfare state. Batsford