- Posted by: essay
- Category: Free essays
It is necessary to say that Shakespeare illustrates in this play different human qualities and the quality of real man is also described in it. In my opinion the real man is a not elemental man, not casual coincidence of “elements”. The real man is not become for example, to the precept or by an imitation. The real man is a man conscious. He consciously makes decision to be a man. Therefore he must decide a question: “To be or not to be (it is possible to “live or not live”) by a man?” He must decide in addition, how in good time to be a man.
A play does not have an upshot at all. Consent to marriage none gave of four beautiful women, and all of them demanded postponements on one year. But, strictly speaking, this is a fully satisfactory upshot, containing a very important and interesting idea. Happiness does not fall a man self in hands. It is needed to deserve it; it is needed to manage to become deserving it. Young metaphysicians just gave way to funny drag-nets. Now they must check up the suddenly blazing up senses, must become people truly simple and faithful. Happiness is a not formula, but way, and they must declare oneself able to go on this way. But, as usual in the comedies of Shakespeare, this idea is expressed without every edifying, and in the easy, humorous form of different humorous tasks, given by beautiful women to falling in love in them young people. custom term paper
Thus, taking into account all above mentioned we could come to the conclusion that Love’s Labour Lost is a comedy about an unnatural conduct, and language plays, at times also artificial, does its difficult for reading. However, the construction of the play is extraordinary theatrically, and explosive originality, its final episodes can be very enthralling in a stage embodiment. Pseudo historical costumery and aristocratic decorativeness served Shakespeare only by cause for claim of the most front-rank ideas and real sense of life. Refinement of court characters of play exposes the emptiness and euphuism of their style and senses unnoticed passes to the parody on it. The attempt of youths of dreamers to go away from life is ridiculed in a play, from reality in abstraction, in empty pretentious drag-nets. Their ridiculous project tips over life and all their philosophic vows fly head over heels with arrival of princess and her ladies. In his play author said: “Where all are guilty, the guilty is not present”. Already in a play Love’s Lost Labour is visible, as quickly and successfully Shakespeare studied at “school of times”, but it not nearly means that to go to this school it was easily for him. W. Shakespeare knew a lot about passions of human. Many of them boil in his works, many of them are visible, clear, knowable the readers of these works.
Knutson, Roslynn. The Repertory of Shakespeare’s Company, 1594-1613. Fayatteville: University of Arkansas Press, 1991.
Shakespeare, William. Love’s Labour Lost. 1598