Custom term paper on In sociology, why do we think of the work of Karl Marx as “conflict theory”?

Higher level of organization and therefore a higher level of awareness of their subordinate group motivational components, such as values, interests, and goals, which are more likely to lead to an open conflict. Gaining mismatch interests of subordinates and leadership are more violent forms of conflict.
As a fact, violent forms of organizational conflicts lead to more radical organizational changes and reallocation of resources (peaceful forms of interpersonal relations will settle better but not always dramatically eliminate the true causes of conflict and normalize relations with the illusion of conflict resolution).
Weak manifestation of the leadership of their interests as administrators fragmented administrative structure are more likely to cause massive conflicts collective performance of subordinates. “Validation of these interpretations of the provisions of the teachings of Marx in relation to the organization can be found in recent studies of conflict and descriptions of practical experience in conflict situations”, as described in Karl Marx. custom term paper
Unlike Marx, who believed that the conflict in the end necessarily increases, Simmel becomes a revolutionary character and leads to structural changes in the system, as described in Karl Marx. Simmel often analyzed, less intensive and sharp conflicts which strengthen the stability and integration of the social system. Simmel, however, made several significant for the overall judgments of the severity of conflict resolution and the strength of the conflict. These judgments have been formalized and summarized in tabular form Turner, according to Karl Marx and Max Weber: Fathers of Sociological theories.
Key provisions of Simmel on the severity of conflicts:
1. The more groups are involved in the conflict, the greater the emotional conflict is.
2. The more “clustered” a group is, the more sharply it is drawn into the conflict.
3. The higher the relative cohesion of the groups involved in the conflict is, the greater the conflict is represented.
4. The stronger the agreement was before the conflict the greater the conflict.
5. The less isolated and group-escalate the conflict through broad-based social structure of the sharper the conflict.
6. The greater the conflict becomes at the end, the sharper it is.
7. The more the participants to report the conflict goes beyond individual goals and interests, so it is sharper.
From the statements that follow a strong emotion caused by the conflict are more likely to lead to violence. In interpersonal conflicts caused by the same feelings of intimacy, hostility or jealousy will increase the acuteness of the conflict. It is essential to note that in intergroup conflicts internal cohesion of groups, the internal harmony of the relations is involved in the conflict groups that are more likely to cause violence, as described in The conflict tradition.
Marx introduced the social and structural causes of conflict conditions that could solve the conflict and which stress the antagonistic nature of the conflict. In the modern theory of conflict (from 60s), there were two areas which are based on a provision of Marx, Simmel, either the dialectical theory of conflict or conflict functionalism.
All in all, it should be noted that “Conflict theory can extend to other struggles existent in society – racial tension between blacks and whites, sexism primarily exerted toward women, religious punishment against a minority group of believers, and so on”, as described in Carl Marx, conflict theory in Sociology.

Author: essay
Professional custom essay writers.

Leave a Reply