- Posted by: essay
- Category: Free essays
It would be necessary to say that all the leaders of some imperialist countries (the core participant in WWI) were relatives – Kaiser, Russian king Nicholas II and British King George V. It goes without saying that confrontation between the Germany and Britain made both George V and Kaiser seek for the suitable their region politics. George V refused all the German titles when the war broke up, tearing out the relive connection with Kaiser.
Alongside with the imperialist leaders there should be mentioned alternative powers. The real force that could prevent the expansion policy of the imperialist government was so called international labor class, which consisted of nearly 150 million people. The labor movement in the whole world was headed by the International, which united 41 socio-democratic parties from 27 world countries consisting of 3,4 million members. But the opportunist leaders of the socio-democratic parties from Europe could do nothing for support the anti-military decision of the 2nd International congresses (it took place accurately before the WWI started). It happened that these strong political forces supported the governmental policies of their imperialist leaders and voted in the parliaments for supporting the military credits. The Socialist leaders of France, Great Britain and Belgium even took an active part in military programs, participating within the bourgeoisie military governments. 2nd International ideology was ruined and it stopped its existence. It should be noted that the left oriented parties of Russia and Germany were the ones that kept on the anti-militarist policy and did not supported the war.
The Russian scenario is well known all over the world. At first the leftists did not supported the military strategy provided by the king, strongly criticizing the intension of the Russian leaders to participate in the WWI and finally it ended by the Revolution of 1917, refuse for further participation in the WWI and Civil war in Russia. The Leftists were supporting the idea that the war has imperialist roots and did not have any brighter perspectives for the working class all over the world. They were supported by the German social-democrats and some French socialist leaders. The revolutionary ideas provided also very significant impact on the WWI and further development of European history. The German November Revolution was the one that played significant role for the whole war process as the people can’t stand oppressive military policy anymore. It is hardly to define was it good or was it not but it is the historical lesson anyway. Kaiser, even supported by manufacturers, could do nothing with the growing indignation from the masses. The German scenario did not cost so many ruins for the country as the Russian one, but it was a total loss of the campaign. The united European power oppressed Kaiser and he could not keep on anymore. It goes without saying that as the united factors started the war and the united factors ended it. The most powerful world states were involved in the conflict and it was looking like the demonstration of scientific and technical achievements of the confronting sides , expanding policies of the country that did not took part in the main division of the colonies and the participation of the private corporations in the supporting the war processes.custom term paper
In the end I would like to return to the very beginning. The represented statistical data, the death rates, the appearing of inhuman weapons that is still become a very contradictory question. The whole WWI was the shift moment in the world and especially European history. It showed who is who, the demonstration of military power and forces showed the equipment and the results of armament rate. The revolution and socialist leaders and ambivalent figure of Lenin in Russian Revolution of 1917 all these were powers played their roles in the WWI, the results of which are still very important. The start of the re-division and the expansion policies could be hardly accepted by contemporary society. Still the case of Kaiser Wilhelm II and other military leaders, who were intended to demonstrate the powers, the united powers that stressed Europe provided perfect historical lesson for further generation. The after effects were different for the many countries. But we know that in the end there was significant crisis in Europe and US and other countries involved in WWI. Understanding of the core ideas and lessons of the First World War is really important for contemporary world. The First World War gave a strong push to the development of missiles of massive attacks and the first weapons of mass destruction were tried. Personally I think that in the present day world such type of conflicts is impossible as the results were undertaken. Historians still argue of the roots of WWI conflict that stressed all the European powers and make them either unite or confront and the common reason is one. During the 10 years Europe was living under the tension and stress, the small attempts of the territory fights were not enough for the countries growing their weapons and making significant inputs into the military and defense industry (it should be noted that manufacturers also supported the idea of the military conflict and took an active part in supporting the governmental forces). They needed to demonstrate the power and started the re-division, more significant than Morocco crisis. The result was WWI engaging the strongest European forces.
1. Albertini, Luigi. “Origins of the War of 1914”. Enigma Books. London. 2005
2. Ritter Gerhard. “The Schlieffen Plan”. 1958
3. Volker R. Berghahn. “Germany and the Approach of War in 1914”. 1993
4. Fritz Fischer. “Germany’s Aims in the First World War”. 1967
5. Laurence Lafore. “The Long Fuse: An Interpretation of the Origins of World War I”. Critical Periods of History. 1965